Este artículo fue publicado en: julio 21, 2015
Taxi services think inside a box. So did Blockbuster. So does Microsoft.
But here’s the thing. Uber, Netflix, and Apple also think inside boxes. So do you. So do I.
A box is a frame, a paradigm, a habit, a perspective, a silo, a self-imposed set of limits; a box is context and interpretation. We cannot think outside boxes. We can, though, choose our boxes. We can even switch from one box to another to another.
Boxes get dangerous when they get obvious, like oft-told stories that harden into cultural truth. Letting a box rust shut is a blunder not of intention but of inattention.
Boxes are invisible until we look for them. Let’s look.
Figure 1 presents a real company as shown by its annual report. If you’d bought its stock at 21 9/16, you’d have almost quadrupled your money over the subsequent four years. My question for you: would you buy its shares now?
I’ve used the financial-history exercise in my corporate workshops on strategic thinking and in my classroom. I’ve observed that most people dive immediately into the numbers when I ask them whether they’d invest now. A cautious or suspicious few ask due-diligence questions.
Almost no one questions whether those numbers are appropriate for the decision at hand. They silently adopt the supreme box of the corporate world: the financial-accounting view of the company.
I am not saying that a neat tabular arrangement of money over time is inherently right or wrong. I am saying that it is unwise not to notice what analytic framework you choose to answer a question. Did the handy financial-accounting box keep you from noticing that I’d said nothing about the company’s market position, customer preferences, cost structure, and much more? Did a box stop you from refusing to make an investment decision based solely on the financials?
The company is Enron.
The numbers are from its 2000 annual report, a year before it went bankrupt. Does it matter that it was Enron in the exercise? Not a bit. Whatever the company, the numbers and insights inside one box don’t include the numbers and insights from other boxes.
Agility is much in demand. It doesn’t, or at least shouldn’t, merely mean hair-trigger reflexes. Something happened! Do something, quickly!
Agility means doing something smart, quickly. Here are some get-smart-fast methods I’ve learned while war-gaming and simulating Fortune 500 companies. Each of them involves noticing and switching boxes.
- Role-play your competition. Prior to a war game, a company believed its planned price cut would work because its competitor couldn’t afford to match it. It changed its mind when its own people, role-playing the competitor, discovered they couldn’t afford not to match the price cut.
- Reverse the labels. You can get an extra kick out of SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. When you’ve completed the lists in each category, reverse the labels. See how thinking grows when strengths become weaknesses (and vice versa) and opportunities become threats (and vice versa).
- Resist the urge to converge. A company faced several competitors, restive customers, and government regulations in flux. In a 15-minute exercise we determined there were millions of possible scenarios ahead. That dispelled the notion that they could plan for “the” future.
- Assume the presence of intelligent life. People often say “they were stupid to do X” when they see X lead to an unhappy outcome. I ask “why would a smartperson do X?” I don’t mean that the person was necessarily smart, or that I agree with them; but it’s dangerous to assume bad outcomes meant that decision-makers were stupid. They might know something you don’t.
Thinking that you must act outside the box is also a box. My colleagues and I worked with a Fortune Global 50 company that had come up with a revolutionary change to its product. The change had passed every internal review. The company wanted one last test, a quantitative (simulation-based) war game, before they launched the revolution.
The simulation showed their revolution would work beautifully… as long as competitors didn’t mind. (Notice that such a possibility wouldn’t occur to companies in a Figure 1 box or even in a customer-research box. That’s why it’d passed the internal reviews.) Spending a little time thinking inside competitors’ boxes revealed that the revolution would trigger the equivalent of nuclear war. The company canceled the revolution.
So, don’t ask how you can think outside the box. Ask how many boxes you can think inside. Then, dive in. The revelations are fine.
See original text: https://goo.gl/RFV4pG